<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Catching up with China</title>
	<atom:link href="http://statelineobserver.com/enviro/catching-up-with-china/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://statelineobserver.com/enviro/catching-up-with-china/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=catching-up-with-china</link>
	<description>&#160; Morenci, Mich. &#38; Fayette, Ohio</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 May 2013 04:45:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: lessersivad</title>
		<link>http://statelineobserver.com/enviro/catching-up-with-china/#comment-897</link>
		<dc:creator>lessersivad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 23:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://statelineobserver.com/?p=4961#comment-897</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting. I&#039;d like to know when the government as a whole started being concerned about &quot;return on investment&quot;. I guess if it don&#039;t blow something/someone up, the government becomes cost conscious....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. I&#8217;d like to know when the government as a whole started being concerned about &#8220;return on investment&#8221;. I guess if it don&#8217;t blow something/someone up, the government becomes cost conscious&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Green</title>
		<link>http://statelineobserver.com/enviro/catching-up-with-china/#comment-890</link>
		<dc:creator>Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 13:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://statelineobserver.com/?p=4961#comment-890</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From TreeHugger:

The US Government has been a big supporter of LEED, thanks to that radical leftist George Bush, who imposed Executive Order 13423, which set &quot;goals in the areas of energy efficiency, acquisition, renewable energy, toxics reductions, recycling, renewable energy, sustainable buildings, electronics stewardship, fleets, and water conservation.&quot; The Department of Defense was a real leader in this, with 49 projects, the most of any Department of government. But if the Republican congress gets its way, it&#039;s over; in the National Defense Authorization Act, there is what Chris Cheatham of Green Building Law Update calls &quot;a real kicker&quot;:

The bill would prohibit FY 2012 DoD funds from being used to achieve a LEED Gold or Platinum certification, however these certifications could be obtained if they impose no additional cost to DoD.
But wait, there&#039;s more!


The bill would also require a cost-benefit analysis and return on investment for energy efficiency attributes and sustainable design achieved through DoD funds used to receive a Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Gold or Platinum certification.
So Congress won&#039;t let the Department of Defense pay for LEED applications, but even if they found the money for it, they would have to also pay for a cost benefit analysis. What would that do to the rainwater collecting roof of the new hospital, its landscaping, or every other feature that reduces water and carbon footprint but doesn&#039;t give a direct cost benefit? They are gone.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From TreeHugger:</p>
<p>The US Government has been a big supporter of LEED, thanks to that radical leftist George Bush, who imposed Executive Order 13423, which set &#8220;goals in the areas of energy efficiency, acquisition, renewable energy, toxics reductions, recycling, renewable energy, sustainable buildings, electronics stewardship, fleets, and water conservation.&#8221; The Department of Defense was a real leader in this, with 49 projects, the most of any Department of government. But if the Republican congress gets its way, it&#8217;s over; in the National Defense Authorization Act, there is what Chris Cheatham of Green Building Law Update calls &#8220;a real kicker&#8221;:</p>
<p>The bill would prohibit FY 2012 DoD funds from being used to achieve a LEED Gold or Platinum certification, however these certifications could be obtained if they impose no additional cost to DoD.<br />
But wait, there&#8217;s more!</p>
<p>The bill would also require a cost-benefit analysis and return on investment for energy efficiency attributes and sustainable design achieved through DoD funds used to receive a Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Gold or Platinum certification.<br />
So Congress won&#8217;t let the Department of Defense pay for LEED applications, but even if they found the money for it, they would have to also pay for a cost benefit analysis. What would that do to the rainwater collecting roof of the new hospital, its landscaping, or every other feature that reduces water and carbon footprint but doesn&#8217;t give a direct cost benefit? They are gone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sybil diccion</title>
		<link>http://statelineobserver.com/enviro/catching-up-with-china/#comment-889</link>
		<dc:creator>sybil diccion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 08:44:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://statelineobserver.com/?p=4961#comment-889</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Their total determination to destroy everything great about this nation is beyond belief. I&#039;m angry as hell about this. I absolutely do not associate with anyone who belongs to organizations intent on this destruction--even if years ago, there was a friendship existing between us.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Their total determination to destroy everything great about this nation is beyond belief. I&#8217;m angry as hell about this. I absolutely do not associate with anyone who belongs to organizations intent on this destruction&#8211;even if years ago, there was a friendship existing between us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
