<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Science teacher&#8217;s dilemma</title>
	<atom:link href="http://statelineobserver.com/education/science-teachers-dilemma/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://statelineobserver.com/education/science-teachers-dilemma/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=science-teachers-dilemma</link>
	<description>&#160; Morenci, Mich. &#38; Fayette, Ohio</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 May 2013 04:45:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sybil diccion</title>
		<link>http://statelineobserver.com/education/science-teachers-dilemma/#comment-1144</link>
		<dc:creator>sybil diccion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 06:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://statelineobserver.com/?p=5991#comment-1144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[for future reference, is there an emoticon for sarcasm?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>for future reference, is there an emoticon for sarcasm?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sybil diccion</title>
		<link>http://statelineobserver.com/education/science-teachers-dilemma/#comment-1143</link>
		<dc:creator>sybil diccion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 06:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://statelineobserver.com/?p=5991#comment-1143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to a 2009 report by the IUCN Polar Bear Specialist Group, of the 19 recognized subpopulations of polar bears, 8 are in decline, 1 is increasing, 3 are stable and 7 don’t have enough data to draw any conclusions. A large number of the big-white polars have drowned for lack of sea ice. Maybe we could contact the president of the Himalayas to see if he has room for the declining species.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to a 2009 report by the IUCN Polar Bear Specialist Group, of the 19 recognized subpopulations of polar bears, 8 are in decline, 1 is increasing, 3 are stable and 7 don’t have enough data to draw any conclusions. A large number of the big-white polars have drowned for lack of sea ice. Maybe we could contact the president of the Himalayas to see if he has room for the declining species.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: contrarian</title>
		<link>http://statelineobserver.com/education/science-teachers-dilemma/#comment-1142</link>
		<dc:creator>contrarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 18:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://statelineobserver.com/?p=5991#comment-1142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Flint-  My point is:  1.  It is not a new problem for teachers.  2.  Teach analytical processes.  

If we don&#039;t, then any false thesis will never be found out.  I don&#039;t have a problem with teaching about climate but don&#039;t denigrate a thought that is contrary to popular opinion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Flint-  My point is:  1.  It is not a new problem for teachers.  2.  Teach analytical processes.  </p>
<p>If we don&#8217;t, then any false thesis will never be found out.  I don&#8217;t have a problem with teaching about climate but don&#8217;t denigrate a thought that is contrary to popular opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flintite</title>
		<link>http://statelineobserver.com/education/science-teachers-dilemma/#comment-1141</link>
		<dc:creator>Flintite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://statelineobserver.com/?p=5991#comment-1141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Science is &quot;a method of acquiring knowledge&quot; using &quot;analytical thinking.&quot; Agreed. So why should we not act and teach based on the overwhelmingly agreed-upon outcomes of that process? Would you demand unanimity and infallibility? It&#039;s hard to imagine any effective scientific education under those ground rules. But wait, your point is really that climate change is a conspiracy of the liberal scientific community and media, right? Never mind; reason doesn&#039;t apply.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Science is &#8220;a method of acquiring knowledge&#8221; using &#8220;analytical thinking.&#8221; Agreed. So why should we not act and teach based on the overwhelmingly agreed-upon outcomes of that process? Would you demand unanimity and infallibility? It&#8217;s hard to imagine any effective scientific education under those ground rules. But wait, your point is really that climate change is a conspiracy of the liberal scientific community and media, right? Never mind; reason doesn&#8217;t apply.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: contrarian</title>
		<link>http://statelineobserver.com/education/science-teachers-dilemma/#comment-1140</link>
		<dc:creator>contrarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 05:31:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://statelineobserver.com/?p=5991#comment-1140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I guess that is problematic if you consider &quot;science&quot; to be the end product instead of &quot;a method of acquiring knowledge&quot; as I do.  This is not a new issue and scientific study continually refines current knowledge.  For instance, today&#039;s science disputes the validity of the &quot;Food Pyramid&quot; that was taught for decades.

Give me science education that teaches analytical thinking any day over memorized thesis.  Science changes everyday so why must we all think the same theories are indisputable?  Studies and interpretations are subject to errors and manipulations just like anything else.

http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2012/02/09/himalayan-glaciers-have-lost-no-ice-in-past-10-years-new-study-reveals/?intcmp=features]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess that is problematic if you consider &#8220;science&#8221; to be the end product instead of &#8220;a method of acquiring knowledge&#8221; as I do.  This is not a new issue and scientific study continually refines current knowledge.  For instance, today&#8217;s science disputes the validity of the &#8220;Food Pyramid&#8221; that was taught for decades.</p>
<p>Give me science education that teaches analytical thinking any day over memorized thesis.  Science changes everyday so why must we all think the same theories are indisputable?  Studies and interpretations are subject to errors and manipulations just like anything else.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2012/02/09/himalayan-glaciers-have-lost-no-ice-in-past-10-years-new-study-reveals/?intcmp=features" rel="nofollow">http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2012/02/09/himalayan-glaciers-have-lost-no-ice-in-past-10-years-new-study-reveals/?intcmp=features</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
