<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: America&#8217;s changing position</title>
	<atom:link href="http://statelineobserver.com/econo/americas-changing-position/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://statelineobserver.com/econo/americas-changing-position/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=americas-changing-position</link>
	<description>&#160; Morenci, Mich. &#38; Fayette, Ohio</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 May 2013 04:45:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sybil diccion</title>
		<link>http://statelineobserver.com/econo/americas-changing-position/#comment-512</link>
		<dc:creator>sybil diccion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Oct 2010 06:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://statelineobserver.com/?p=3022#comment-512</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Taken from  ontheissues.org:

&quot;The great budget battle finally ended in August, with the passage of Bill&#039;s (President Clinton&#039;s) economic plan. Before the vote, I had spoken with wavering Democrats. One Republican Congresswoman called me to explain that she agreed with the President&#039;s goal to tame the deficit but had been ordered by her leadership to vote &quot;no&quot; regardless of her convictions. In the end, not a single Republican voted for the balanced budget package. It squeaked through the House by one vote, and Vice President Gore in his official role as President of the Senate had to vote to break a 50-50 vote tie. Several courageous Democrats, who did what they believed to be in America&#039;s long-term interests, lost in the next election.

&quot;The plan wasn&#039;t everything the Administration had wanted, but it signaled the return of fiscal responsibility for the government and the beginning of an economic turnaround for the country. To pay for these reforms, the plan raised taxes on gasoline and on highest-income Americans&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Taken from  ontheissues.org:</p>
<p>&#8220;The great budget battle finally ended in August, with the passage of Bill&#8217;s (President Clinton&#8217;s) economic plan. Before the vote, I had spoken with wavering Democrats. One Republican Congresswoman called me to explain that she agreed with the President&#8217;s goal to tame the deficit but had been ordered by her leadership to vote &#8220;no&#8221; regardless of her convictions. In the end, not a single Republican voted for the balanced budget package. It squeaked through the House by one vote, and Vice President Gore in his official role as President of the Senate had to vote to break a 50-50 vote tie. Several courageous Democrats, who did what they believed to be in America&#8217;s long-term interests, lost in the next election.</p>
<p>&#8220;The plan wasn&#8217;t everything the Administration had wanted, but it signaled the return of fiscal responsibility for the government and the beginning of an economic turnaround for the country. To pay for these reforms, the plan raised taxes on gasoline and on highest-income Americans&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: contrarian</title>
		<link>http://statelineobserver.com/econo/americas-changing-position/#comment-511</link>
		<dc:creator>contrarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Oct 2010 16:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://statelineobserver.com/?p=3022#comment-511</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hmmmm, I do not have your personal strength to refrain. I assume you were applauding the economic might of the USA during a certain time in history.  I&#039;m glad you view that as a good thing.  Some would have us believe it is not good thing.

I&#039;m sure all the civics minded people that read this blog understand that the President attempts to set an agenda for the budget and the congress actually holds the purse strings.   The chart below appears to signify that the republicans played a significant role in the time period in question. 

Year	 Congress	 President	 Senate (100)	 House (435)
2009	   111th	                D	              D - 55***	            D - 256
2007	   110th	                R	              D - 51**	            D - 233
2005	   109th	                R	              R - 55	            R - 232
2003	   108th	                R	              R - 51	            R - 229
2001	   107th	                R	              D*	                    R - 221
1999	   106th	                D	              R - 55	            R - 223
1997	   105th	                D	              R - 55	            R - 228
1995	   104th	                D	              R - 52	            R - 230
1993	   103rd	                D	              D - 57	            D - 258
1991	   102nd	                R	              D - 56	            D - 267
1989	   101st	                R	              D - 55	            D - 260
1987	   100th	                R	              D - 55	            D - 258]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmmm, I do not have your personal strength to refrain. I assume you were applauding the economic might of the USA during a certain time in history.  I&#8217;m glad you view that as a good thing.  Some would have us believe it is not good thing.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure all the civics minded people that read this blog understand that the President attempts to set an agenda for the budget and the congress actually holds the purse strings.   The chart below appears to signify that the republicans played a significant role in the time period in question. </p>
<p>Year	 Congress	 President	 Senate (100)	 House (435)<br />
2009	   111th	                D	              D &#8211; 55***	            D &#8211; 256<br />
2007	   110th	                R	              D &#8211; 51**	            D &#8211; 233<br />
2005	   109th	                R	              R &#8211; 55	            R &#8211; 232<br />
2003	   108th	                R	              R &#8211; 51	            R &#8211; 229<br />
2001	   107th	                R	              D*	                    R &#8211; 221<br />
1999	   106th	                D	              R &#8211; 55	            R &#8211; 223<br />
1997	   105th	                D	              R &#8211; 55	            R &#8211; 228<br />
1995	   104th	                D	              R &#8211; 52	            R &#8211; 230<br />
1993	   103rd	                D	              D &#8211; 57	            D &#8211; 258<br />
1991	   102nd	                R	              D &#8211; 56	            D &#8211; 267<br />
1989	   101st	                R	              D &#8211; 55	            D &#8211; 260<br />
1987	   100th	                R	              D &#8211; 55	            D &#8211; 258</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sybil diccion</title>
		<link>http://statelineobserver.com/econo/americas-changing-position/#comment-507</link>
		<dc:creator>sybil diccion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Oct 2010 04:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://statelineobserver.com/?p=3022#comment-507</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;But there was a short period between the end of the Cold War and the crash of Lehman Brothers where the U.S. was the superpower not only militarily, but economically.&quot;

Hmmmm, let&#039;s see; that would be 1991 (end of Cold War) to 2008 (Lehman Bros crash). I&#039;ll refrain from making any obvious observations regarding these dates but let me just say that Clinton was elected at the end of 1991.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;But there was a short period between the end of the Cold War and the crash of Lehman Brothers where the U.S. was the superpower not only militarily, but economically.&#8221;</p>
<p>Hmmmm, let&#8217;s see; that would be 1991 (end of Cold War) to 2008 (Lehman Bros crash). I&#8217;ll refrain from making any obvious observations regarding these dates but let me just say that Clinton was elected at the end of 1991.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
